Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35392 (RAJ)

RAHIS @ TOFIK S/O SHER MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16513/2024 · 2025-01-06

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16513/2024 Rahis @ Tofik S/o Sher Mohammad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vishambhatara, Police Station Shergarh, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Resident Of Khala Guraksar, Police Station Hathin, District Palval (Haryana) (At Present Petitioner Confined At Sub Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.201/2024 registered at Police Station Kolwa, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:515] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16513/2024] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and contends that the accused-petitioner having 3 similar nature of cases, therefore, considering the gravity of the offences, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rahis @ Tofik S/o Sher Mohammad in connection with FIR No.201/2024 registered at Police Station Kolwa, District Dausa shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge. 7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Magistrate. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -20