CWP- 7560-2025 -1- 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- 7560-2025 Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 DR. RAMESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Anuj Dewan, Advocate for respondents-University. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order, dated 27.02.2025, Annexure P-10, whereby the private respondents have been nominated as members of the Executive Council allegedly in violation of Statute 11 of Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology Murthal Act, 2006 (for short, ‘the Act of 2006’). 2. Learned counsel for the respondents-University points out that the petitioners have an alternate remedy under Section 31 of the Act of 2006 Seema 2025.04.03 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP- 7560-2025 -2- to make a representation regarding irregular or illegal appointment of members of any authority to the Chancellor, whose decision in that regard shall be final. He submits that the petitioners have already made a representation, dated 03.03.2025, Annexure P-11, to the University in this regard which will be forwarded to the Chancellor within a period of seven days for an appropriate decision. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the University, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 4. Ordered accordingly. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 03.04.2025 JUDGE Seema Seema Seema Seema Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Seema 2025.04.03 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document