- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4037 WP No. 276 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 276 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KOKILA, W/O JAYARAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NEW MODEL HOUSE, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. 2. RAJESH, S/O DEVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT KENNEDYS TELUGU LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 3. JYOTHI, W/O MOSES, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT CRICKET BLOCK, MRIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. 4. ANDRAIAH, S/O LATE CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO. 47, ANDHRA BLOCK, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4037 WP No. 276 of 2024 5. YESUPADHAM, S/O LATE JACOB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NEW MYSORE HALL, MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF KOLAR - 563 119. 6. MERCY W/O VINCENT, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 33, TELUGU BAND LINE, OORGAUM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 120. 7. SUNITHA, W/O PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 18, ANDHRA BLOCK MARIKUPPAM POST, KGF, KOLAR - 563 119. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.S. JEEVAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA STATE SAFAI KARMACHARI, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SAIRIA BAG, NO. 19/4, 3RD FLOOR, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4037 WP No. 276 of 2024 CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052. 3. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, KARNATAKA STATE SAFAI KARMACHARI, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1; SMT. MANJULA D, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BANGALORE DATED 24.03.2023 PASSED BY R1 ANNEXURE-J AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the respondents No.2 and 3 have assured that they would sanction Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) towards the rehabilitation of the petitioners and in view of the - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:4037 WP No. 276 of 2024 assurance given by the respondents, the petitioners do not press the writ petition. 2. The memo is placed on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK