[2025:RJ-JP:4532-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1242/2024 1. Ramesh Chandra Pareek S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad, Aged About 74 Years, R/o 3589, Kan Mahajan Ka Bad, Govind Rajiyon Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Krishna Mathur W/o Shri Ajeet Kumar Mathur, Aged About 68 Years, R/o 1078, Ram Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Smt. Kamla Pareek W/o Shri Shankar Lal Pareek, Aged About 67 Years, R/o 32, Rana Pratap Nagar, Near Braj Bal School, Jhotwara, Jaipur. 4. Smt. Meena Pareek W/o Shri Babulal Pareek, Aged About 65 Years, R/o B-1 (A), Vivekanand Colony, Nayakhera, Ambabari, Jaipur. 5. Anil Pareek S/o Shri Madan Mohan Pareek, Aged about 66 years R/o 1972, Kali Pahadi House, Barah Bhaiyon Ka Chauraha, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Krishan Kunal, Secretary To The Govt. Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Ashish Modi, Director Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Shri Sunil Singhal, District Education Officer (Secondary Jaipur-I), Jaipur Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. 4. Shri Laxmikant Pareek Secretary, Managing Committee, S.S.G. Pareek P.g. College, Banipark Jaipur. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Govt., Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishwar Lal Jain For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS [2025:RJ-JP:4532-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-1242/2024] Order 03/02/2025 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 30.11.2017. 2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem. 3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioners. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioners shall also be examined in terms of an order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:- “1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks. 2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today. 3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.” [2025:RJ-JP:4532-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-1242/2024] 4. All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of College Education as also the private school education officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Commissionerate of College Education, towards compliance of the order which was passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Gaurav/21