ARUN DEEP @ ARUN DEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/16573/2024 · 2025-07-08
Sumeet Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35386 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35386 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
291
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16573-2024 DATE OF DECISION: 08.07.2025
ARUN DEEP @ ARUN DEEP KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Manglesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Batta, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. …..
SUMEET GOEL
, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh, on the same cause of action, after arraying all concerned, in terms of the dicta of Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M-48043-2023 titled “Rakesh Dass versus State of Haryana and another”, decided on 22.11.2024. Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) 08.07.2025
JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2025.07.08 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document