KUNWAR YADAV ALIAS RAJKUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5928/2025 · 2025-10-16
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35386 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35386 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:32216
--1-- A.B.A. No. 5928 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5928 of 2025
---- Kunwar Yadav @ Rajkumar Yadav, age 42 years, son of Late Gaju Yadav, resident of village – Alkadih (Salagi), PO – Jabra, PS – Simariya, Jirua Khurd, District – Chatra, 825103
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Paritosh Rai, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Advocate
---- 03/16.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State through V.C.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.07 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 15(c), 17(c), 18(b) and 25 of NDPS Act pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations are made against the petitioner of cultivating poppy plants in gairmajarua land. He further submits in identical situation co- accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.5307 of 2025, 3025 of 2025 and 3075 of 2025.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State through V.C. opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of cultivation of poppy plants. She also submits that one criminal antecedent is there against the petitioner.
2025:JHHC:32216
--2-- A.B.A. No. 5928 of 2025
5. In reply, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that so far criminal antecedent is concerned that is in the same line and that FIR was registered earlier and after 15 days the second/present FIR has been lodged and the allegations are same and in the first FIR the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail.
6. In view of the above and considering that the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail in the first FIR and just after 15 days the present FIR has been lodged and the allegations in the present FIR are similar of the first FIR and even the land is said to be gairmajarua and that is not of the petitioner and in identical situation co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in aforesaid ABAs, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Latehar in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.07 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 16.10.2025 Sangam/