Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35382 (AP)

K.V.V.S.N Murthy v. M/s Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company

WP/15107/2010 · 2025-08-20

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010562922010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15107/2010 Between: 1. K.V.V.S.N MURTHY, S/O SOMARAJU RETIRED ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER,OFFICE OF THE ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD 2ND STREET, VIDYUT NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/S ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LTD REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR 5TH FLOOR CORPORATE OFFICE, P&T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HUMAN RESOURCE, DEVELOPMENT,. M/S.ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the respondents in not conferring the benefits of notional promotion on the petitioner in the category of Assistant Divisional Engineer with effect from the date when his immediate Junior Mr K.Venkateswara Rao was promoted as Assistant Divisional Engineer is arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to confer the said benefit of notional promotion and the incidental monetary benefits including higher rate of pension to the petitioner and grant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 19041 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix an early date for hearing of the wp IA NO: 3 OF 2010(WPMP 90265 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 12911 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to take up the hearing of the writ petition W.P.No.507 of 2010 on out of its turn and grant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. . The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him and could not get instructions from him. 2. The matter is of the year 2010. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, this Writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. If at all the petitioner feels that cause in this writ petition survives, he can move an appropriate application within a period of two(02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS