Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:40948 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.3066 of 2019 Decided on: 01.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Laxmi Verma
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?.
For the petitioner: Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2-State.
None for other respondents.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Ms. Neha Thakur, Advocate, appearing vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that due to subsequent events, the petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings. [Statement Taken on Record].
2. Prayer being innocuous is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also.
3. Taking into account the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is closed.
2025:HHC:40948 - 2 -
In aforesaid terms, the instant petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 1st December, 2025
[himani]