HARI SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CWP/7787/2025 · 2025-04-21
Deepinder Singh Nalwa, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35374 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35374 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP- 7787 of 2025 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 138 CWP- 7787 of 2025 Date of Decision:21.04.2025 Hari Singh and another
....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5-HSVP. **** SUDHIR SINGH
, J. (Oral)
1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent-authorities to take necessary action/decision on the proposals dated 26.03.2024 (Annexure P-12) and dated 20.02.2025 (Annexure P-16) submitted by them in response to their notices dated DINESH 2025.04.28 00:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP- 7787 of 2025 2
24.03.2024 (Annexure P-11) and dated 14.02.2025 (Annexure P-15).
2. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 to 5-HSVP and submits that the petitioners have already made representation/proposal dated 20.02.2025 (Annexure P-16) to respondent No.5, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioners would be satisifed, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with the concerns/grievances and pass an appropriate
order on the said representation/proposal.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the said representation/proposal shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law.
4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5-Estate Officer-II, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, to look into the pending representation/proposal dated 20.02.2025 (Annexure P-16) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, DINESH 2025.04.28 00:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP- 7787 of 2025 3
preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH)
JUDGE (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE April 21, 2025
dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.04.28 00:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document