Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35356 (AP)

S. SURESH v. C & M.D., AP SPDCL & 2 ORS.

WP/45170/2016 · 2025-08-06

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010560102016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45170/2016 Between: 1. S. SURESH, S/O LATE SRI DHARMAJNANI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, APSPDCL, CHANDARLAPADU VILLAGE AS MANDAL, KRISHA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. C M D AP SPDCL 2 ORS, LTD, TIRUCHUNAUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HRD, APSPDCL, TIRUCHUNAUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION ELECTRICAL, APSPDCL, PWD GROUNDS, BUNDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following ORDER: On 10.04.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed to 01.08.2025. On 01.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 07.08.2025 Ivd THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.45170 of 2016 Date: 07.08.2025 Ivd