MANGE RAM SHARMA S/O SHRI GYANIRAM SHARMA v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/19525/2024 · 2025-03-11
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35352 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35352 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11038] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19525/2024 Mange Ram Sharma S/o Shri Gyaniram Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Village Jatuwas Post Office Vijoli, Tehsil Kot Kasim, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Raj.
2. The Chief Manager, The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sindhi Camp Depot, Raj. ----Respondents With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19508/2024 Raj Singh S/o Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Jat Behror, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Raj.
2. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sindhi Camp Depot, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 11/03/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:11038] (2 of 2) [CW-19525/2024]
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6843/2024 titled as Bharat Singh & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. decided on 25.04.2024, wherein reliance is placed upon Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr, and submitted that instant matter has akin factual narratives as that of above cited, therefore, the instant matter can be decided in light of the same. The relevant portion of the same is reiterated as herein below: -
“4. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners may be permitted to file a representation before the respondents, who shall consider the same in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Tara Chand (supra).”
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents has not refuted the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs respondents to consider the representation, if so filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks in light of the dictum encapsulated in Tara Chand (supra).
4. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed of in terms of Bharat Singh & Ors (supra). Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/169 & 171