IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.183 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Devi Chand …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Dhanvanti & Ms. Anuja Mehta, proxy counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents for implementation and execution of the order/judgment dated 18.04.2023 passed by this Court in CWPOA No.1671 of 2020, titled as Devi Chand Vs. The State of H.P. and others, whereby afore petition came to be disposed with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of LPA No.165 of 2021, State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Surajmani and another. Since, needful has not been done by the respondents, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid orders, sought to be executed, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of three weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of the afore undertaking given by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful, positively within a period of six weeks from today, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 10, 2025 (sunil)