Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3535 (PNJ)

PRIYA CONSTRUCTION v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/32809/2025 · 2026-03-16

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.32809 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.03.2026 M/s Priya Construction ….Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Jagdeep Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 7 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to clear his final bills and security amount. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3-Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, on instructions from Mr. Harish Kumar, Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, submits that admitted liability would be discharged within four weeks from today. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangements. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.16 04:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.32809 of 2025 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that if payment is not made within the aforesaid period, the respondents would be liable to pay interest @ 6% per annum on the expiry of said period. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 16.03.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.16 04:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document