Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35349 (JHR)

AMIT SUDHAKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

WPC/6326/2025 · 2025-11-18

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34376 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.6326 of 2025 ------ Amit Sudhakar, son of Shri Nand Kumar Prabhakar, resident of Village Pachkedia, P.O. Pachkedia, P.S. Nawajaypur, District Palamau, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Program Officer, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau. 4. The Block Education Extension Officer, Patan-2, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Patan, District Palamau. 5. The District Education Officer-cum-District Program Officer, Jharkhand Education Project, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau. 6. The Area Education Officer, Sadar, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Rakhi Rani, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vishal Kr. Rai, AC to GA-IV Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate ------ 03/ 18.11.2025 Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondents to expeditiously verify the educational certificates of the petitioner and to restore the enhanced honorarium in favour of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still getting lesser honorarium due to which he is suffering a huge financial crisis. She thus prays that suffice it would 2025:JHHC:34376 2 be, if a direction is given to respondent No.2 – The Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council (JEPC), Ranchi, to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation annexing all the documents, before respondent No.2 – The Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council, Ranchi, within three weeks. 5. On receipt of such representation, the respondent No.2 – JEPC, will consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order, within six weeks. 6. If the petitioner is found entitled for any benefit, the same should be extended to him within two weeks thereafter. 7. If any part of the claim / representation is rejected for any reason, a detailed speaking order should be communicated to the petitioner. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th November, 2025 Prashant. Cp-2