VIJAY SINGH @ PAPLYA S/O SHRI RAMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/2256/2024 · 2025-01-16
Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition(Parole) No. 2256/2024 Vijay Singh @ Paplya S/o Shri Ramsingh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Baldevgarh Police Station Tehla Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present in Special Central Jail Shyalawas Dausa (Raj.) Through His Wife Namely Manisha Devi W/o Shri Vijay Singh @ Paplya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Baldevgarh, Police Station Tehla, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) 301410 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The District Magistrate, Dausa.
3. Superintendent Special Central Jail, Shyalawas, Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 16/01/2025
1. Petitioner through his wife has preferred this criminal writ petition(Parole) seeking emergent parole on the ground of ailment of petitioner’s wife.
2. In the reply submitted by the State, it is mentioned that petitioner’s wife was directed to appear before the Medical Board constituted at Alwar, however, the petitioner has refused to send her wife for examination before the Medical Board at Alwar on the ground that it is 80 Kms. away from his residence and he is
(2 of 2) [CRLW-2256/2024] adamant that his wife should be examined at Dausa which is 45 Kms from his residence.
3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner’s wife is alone, therefore, he had requested that Medical Board should examine her at Dausa.
4. Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the criminal writ petition(parole). It is contended that petitioner has refused to send her wife to Alwar for examination by Medical Board, hence, petitioner is not entitled to any relief from the Court.
5. We have considered the contentions.
6. Petitioner has sought emergent parole on the ground of ailment of his wife. Respondent-State has already constituted a Medical Board to examine petitioner’s wife but petitioner is insisting that his wife should be examined at Dausa instead of Alwar.
7. Since, petitioner has refused to send her wife to Alwar for examination by the Medical Board constituted, petitioner is not entitled to any relief from the Court.
8. Criminal Writ Petition(Parole) is accordingly, dismissed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J HEENA/39