Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:32296
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7435 of 2025 ---- Pintu Mandal, aged about 37 years, S/o Bechan Mandal, R/o Mirzachawki, Gandhinagar, Neemgachhi, PO and P.S. Mirzachowki, District-Sahibganj, Jharkhand
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.2, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ----
02/Dated: 17th October, 2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 04.09.2023, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T No.89 of 2024, arising out of Mirzachowki P.S Case No.14 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 341/149, 323/149, 342/149 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Sahibganj.
3. The prayer for bail of the applicant was earlier rejected by this Court vide
order dated 23.02.2024 passed in B.A No.10655 of 2023 and thereafter, his prayer for bail was again rejected by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2024 passed in B.A No.4702 of 2024.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. An affidavit has been filed showing that the prosecution witness is closed.
6. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this applicant is hereby, rejected once again.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
17th October, 2025 Raja/Uploaded