210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** RSA-2504-2000 Date of decision : 19.08.2025 Jarnail Singh ... Appellant Versus Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Manbir Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Aman Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. A perusal of the orders shows that there is no interim order in favour of the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that as per his instructions, the present appellant has retired on 31.07.2007 and has died on 25.11.2009 and thus, nothing survives in the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in view of the above, the present appeal be disposed of but liberty be granted to the LRs of the appellant to revive the appeal in case any cause survives. 4. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE August 19, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.08.20 11:42 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment