[2025:RJ-JP:7067] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16222/2024 Sunita Devi W/o Surajbhan, R/o Pehal Police Station Mundawar District Khairthal Tijara. At Present In Central Jail, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. Gov. Adv. Mr. Vivek Gaur, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.514/2024 registered at Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Sections 103(1), 351(3) & 3(5) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the allegation of causing fatal injury on the person of deceased is against co-accused Dayaram. It is submitted that it is alleged in the FIR that petitioner caught hold the deceased and co-accused Dayaram caused injury on the neck (near ear) of deceased by axe (kulhadi). Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:7067] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16222/2024] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he caught hold the deceased and co-accused Dayaram caused injuries on the neck of the deceased. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that petitioner is female; she is in custody since 07.10.2024; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Sunita Devi W/o Surajbhan, shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /131