101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.2649 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.03.2025 HARDEEP KHATRI .....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS ........Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Randeep S.Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * * * ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to grant him the benefit of parole. 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by preferring a petition bearing CRWP-6800-2024 titled as Hardeep Versus State of Haryana and others, which was allowed by this Court on 29.10.2024. Consequently, the petitioner had been released on parole on 12.11.2024 for a period of 06 week and he had surrendered back on 25.12.2024. He, therefore, submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous and in the event of the petitioner seeking parole henceforth, he shall have to prefer a fresh application in that regard. SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.03.27 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP No.2649 of 2025 (O&M) --2-- 4. In the aforenoted facts and circumstances, this petition has been rendered infructuous and stands disposed of accordingly. In the event of the petitioner seeking parole henceforth, he shall prefer a fresh application in that regard, which would be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 27.03.2025 JUDGE sandeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.03.27 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.