LAXMI NARAYAN MAHATO v. CHHATTISGARH ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA
WPC/3740/2025 · 2025-07-16
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35344 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35344 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:33916
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3740 of 2025 Laxmi Narayan Mahato Member Of Arya Samaj, Baijnath Para, And Up-Pradhan Raipur Division, Chhattisgarh Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Office At - Dayanand Parisar, Arya Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District - Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Through Its President - Ram Kumar Patel O/o Dayananad Parisar, Arya Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District - Durg (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Thorugh Its Mantri Shri Avani Bhushan Purang, O/o Dayananad Parisar, Arya Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District - Durg (C.G.) 3 - Registrar Firms And Society Through Deputy Registrar, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-1, 3rd Floor, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Inquiry Committee Through Its Up-Mantri, Tarakant, Arya Samaj, Baijnath Para, Raipur Division, District - Raipur (C.G.)
---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA For Respondents No.1, 2 & 4 : Mr. Vivek Verma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Order on Board
2 17/07/2025 Heard.
1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. The petitioner has been filed this writ petition on the following relief(s) :
“10.1 That, Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the pending appeal before the election scheduled on 20.07.2025. 10.2 That, Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to participate the petitioner in the election only to extent of voting as the election scheduled on
20.07.2025. 10.3 That, Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to take necessary step to enable the cast his vote in election dated 20.07.2025. 10.4 Any other relief may be granted by this Hon'ble Court as it deems fit under the present circumstances.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the instant petition is filed by the petitioner not against any particular order but inaction of the respondent no.1 and 2 whereby respondent no.1 and 2 has not been decided the pending appeal and exclusion of name of the member from the voter list of the representatives of the Arya Samaj, Baijnath Para, Raipur and the name of the petitioner deleted from the voter list
3 without terminating his membership as per bylaws. The petitioner would therefore be entitled to extent of voting therein as the election are scheduled on 20.06.2025.
4. Learned counsel for respondents No.1, 2 & 4 contended that the respondent authorities are ready to decide the appeal of the petitioner in accordance with law.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the parties, at this stage, the petition is
disposed of directing to respondents No.1, 2 & 4 to consider and decide the pending appeal of the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of ‘90 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this
order, in accordance with rules, regulations and law.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/-
(Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant