Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:35022
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7986 of 2025 1 - Rajeev Pathak S/o Late Gouri Shankar Pathak Aged About 60 Years Occupation - Service, Presently Posted And Working As Assistant Engineer, In The Office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Sarguja Chhattisgarh R/o Behind Mega Shop, Datta Colony, Ambikapur, District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Schedule Tribe And Schedule Caste Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Department of Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajaram Pushan Aged About 51 Years Occupation Service Presently Posted And Working Sub-Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Sub-Division Wardarfnagar, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Order on Board 22-07-2025
1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sarguja to Koriya.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer
order the petitioner has already made representation which is still pending Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN
2 before the transfer committee. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below:
“8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथत शासकीय सेवक द्वारा अपने स्थानांतरण के विवरूद्ध अभ्यावेदन के वल स्थानांतरण नीतित के उल्लंघन होने पर ही उक्त उल्लंघन होने वाले कं ति$का के संबंध में स्पष्ट आधारों के साथ स्थानांतरण आदेश जारी होने की तितथिथ से 15 विदवस के भीतर प्रश्नाधीन स्थानांतरण आदेश की प्रतित सविहत शासन द्वारा गवि1त वरिरष्ठ सति4वों की सविमतित के संयोजक एवं सति4व, सामान्य प्रशासन विवभाग को प्रस्तुत विकया जा सके गा। सविमतित द्वारा ऐसे प्रकरणों का इस स्थानांतरण नीतित के प्रकाश में परीक्षण करने के पश्चात अपनी अनुशंसा संबतिधत विवभाग को प्रेवि=त की जाएगी।”
3. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this
order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation so made by the petitioner in accordance with law in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order on its own merits within a further period of two weeks. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
4. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said transfer committee.
5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil