2025:JHHC:13084 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 1425 of 2024 ---- 1. Gita Devi, aged about 37 years, wife of Rajendra Ram, resident of Manpur, P.O. & P.S. Ranka, District-Garhwa. 2. Umesh Sah, aged about 42 years, son of Sukan Sah, resident of village-Bouliya, P.O. Sonehara, P.S. Dandai, District-Garhwa. 3. Shiv Kumar Ram, aged about 53 years, son of Kameshwar Ram, resident of Kachanpur, P.O. & P.S. Ranka, District Garhwa. ..........Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi; 2. Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Child Development Project Committee, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa; 3. Programme Manager, Child Development Project Committee, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa; 4. Project Director, Child Development Project Society, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa; .........Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Sahni, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Shalini Shahdeo, AC to SC(L&C)-I ---- 05/01.05.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners praying for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to adjust these petitioners in other adjacent Government Schools and to pay the current honorarium including arrears accrued thereon. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are fully entitled to be adjusted in adjacent Government Schools and also for current honorarium as well as arrears accrued thereon. He further submits that recommendation has already been made by the competent-authorities which is apparent from Annexures-5 and 6 to the writ application; however, nothing had happened till date. Learned counsel further submits that though the petitioners have represented the concerned respondents but no decision has been taken as yet. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter-affidavit has been filed and as such, the petitioners may be 2025:JHHC:13084 2 directed to approach the 2nd respondent so that their grievances may be redressed. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is hereby disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter with regard to the grievance raised by the petitioners by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the law and applicable Rules and Regulations within a period of 12 weeks. The petitioners are directed to serve a copy of this writ application to the 2nd respondent as early as possible. 5. If the order would be in favour of these Petitioners, then the necessary consequential benefits shall also be extended to them within a further period of 8 weeks. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal