Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35323 (JHR)

VEENA MEHTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2544/2019 · 2025-10-06

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30755 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2544 of 2019 --------- Veena Mehta, aged about 31 years, Wife Bhagirath Kumar Mahto, Resident of Village: Dhori Basti, Badkitand, P.O. Dhori, P.S: Bermo, Dist: Bokaro, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary of Department of Personnel, & Rajbhasa, Administrative Reforms Jharkhand At Project Bulding, Dhurwa, Ranchi, PO & PS- Dhurwa, Dist-Palamau, Jharkhand 3. The chairman, of Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, At- Chai Bagan Kalinagar, PO & PS- Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro at Bokaro Head Secretiate office, PO & PS-Bokaro, Dist- Bokaro, State- Jharkhand 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bermo (Tenugat), Bokaro, Bermo Sub-Divisinal Office, PO & PS- Bermo, Dist- Bokaro, State- Jharkahnd ....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. For the Resp.-State : Mr. Prabhat Kumar, SC-II For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Adv Mr. Prince Kumar, Adv --------- 09/06.10.2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application, inasmuch as the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A. if any also stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 06.10.2025 Amardeep/-