Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53750 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11912 of 2025 Applicant :- Amreek Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pavan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Learned A.G.A. has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 27.03.2025. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.86 of 2024, under Sections 65(1), 89, 351(2), 351(3) B.N.S. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Rehar, District Bijnor, during the pendency of trial. 5. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have established corporeal relationship with the victim several times by force by threatening her, as such, impregnated her and had got the said pregnancy terminated on 01.07.2024. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about four days from the date of termination of pregnancy of the victim and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The allegations are per se false. Learned counsel has further stated that the victim is major aged about 18 years as per ossification test report. 7. Leaned counsel for the applicant has further argued that the story as narrated stands falsified from the fact that no DNA profiling of the fetus terminated has been done by the prosecution. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.07.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. The Supreme Court in the case of Niranjan Singh and another vs. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote and Others, AIR 1980 SC 785 has avoided detailed examination of the evidence and elaborate documentation of the merits of the case as no party should have the impression that his case has been prejudiced. A prima facie satisfaction of case is needed but it is not the same as an exhaustive exploration of the merits in the order itself. 10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the facts that the FIR is delayed by about four days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused coupled with the fact that the victim is 18 years old, and taking into consideration the settled law of the Supreme Court passed in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors., 2022 INSC 690 and Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 INSC 595 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Amreek, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 12. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 13. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad