IN T 131 Sarvesh Ku Sh. Satende CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. disobedienc of this Cour State of Har 2. was dispos Commission 3. aforesaid di with. It is s competent COCP-5695-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5695 of Date of decision : sh Kumar and others Versus atender Kumar Gupta, Commissioner AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Mohit, Advocate (through V for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., I GUPTA J. (Oral) The present contempt petition h edience of the order dated 13.11.2024 pa s Court in CRWP-10872-2024, titled “S f Haryana and others” (Annexure P-1). Vide the aforesaid order dated disposed of with the following dire issioner of Police, Faridabad :- “…to look into the repr (Annexure P-3) submitte appropriate steps, if re accordance with law.” Learned counsel appearing for said directions issued by the Writ Court It is submitted that in pursuance of the etent authority has duly considered 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 695 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-05.03.2026 …..Petitioners ioner of Police, Faridabad …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ugh VC) . A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging willful 024 passed by a predecessor Bench “Sarvesh Kumar and others vs. 1). dated 13.11.2024, the writ petition g direction to respondent No.3- representation dated 06.10.2024 itted by the petitioners and take if required, at the earliest, in ng for the State submits that the Court have already been complied of the order dated 13.11.2024, the idered the representation dated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 06.10.2024 been passed 4. petitioners h by the comp complied w 5. the record. 6. 10872-2024 consider the and to take a 7. authority to compliance considered a 8. Court by le already pas representati the Writ Co 9. compliance has been fi order dated 10. complied w COCP-5695-2025 (O & M) .2024 submitted by the petitioners and passed on 09.01.2025. It is further submitted that on oners has been duly considered and a rea e competent authority, the directions iss lied with. I have heard learned counsel for cord. A perusal of the order dated 1 2024 shows that this Court had merely der the representation dated 06.10.2024 take appropriate steps, if required, in ac It is well settled that where a to consider a representation and pa liance of such direction stands satisfied o dered and a reasoned order is passed by t In the present case, it has been by learned counsel for the State that y passed a speaking order dated 09.01 sentation submitted by the petitioners. T rit Court already stands complied with. It is also pertinent to note liance having been made on 09.01.2025, een filed much later on 17.11.2025 alle dated 13.11.2024. Once the directions issued by lied with by the respondents, there w 2 s and a speaking order has already at once the representation of the d a reasoned order has been passed ns issued by this Court stand fully sel for the parties and have perused ated 13.11.2024 passed in CRWP- merely directed respondent No.3 to .2024 submitted by the petitioners , in accordance with law. ere a Court directs the competent and pass an appropriate order, the sfied once the representation is duly d by the competent authority. been brought to the notice of this e that the competent authority has 09.01.2025 while considering the ners. Thus, the direction issued by with. note that despite the aforesaid .2025, the present contempt petition 25 alleging non-compliance of the d by this Court had already been here was no justification for the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioners t the present amounts to 11. proceedings 12. costs of Rs.1 13. through the 14. the aforesai report to the date of rece 15. learned Dist March 05, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-5695-2025 (O & M) oners to invoke the contempt jurisdictio resent contempt petition, despite com nts to a misuse of the process of the Cour In view of the above, no c edings against the respondents is made o Accordingly, the present contem of Rs.10,000/- to be recovered from the p The aforesaid costs shall be re gh the concerned District Judge, Faridaba The learned District Judge, Farid oresaid amount from the petitioners and t to the Registry of this Court within a pe f receipt of a certified copy of this order. The Registry is directed to send d District Judge, Faridabad for necessary , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 3 diction of this Court. The filing of e compliance of the writ order, e Court. no case for initiating contempt ade out. contempt petition is dismissed with the petitioners. be recovered from the petitioners ridabad, in accordance with law. , Faridabad shall ensure recovery of ers and shall forward a compliance in a period of three months from the order. to send a copy of this order to the cessary compliance. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document