APHC010559622008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 167/2008 Between: 1. SRI GUDLA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.LATE GUDLA APPALA NAIDU, HINDU R/O.D.NO.53-14-33, P & T COLONY, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SMT GUDLA GUNAVATHI 2 ORS, W/O.LATE KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU R/O.NEAR ZINC RAILWAY GATE, MINDI POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. GUNDLA PAVAN KUMARI, D/O.LATE KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU R/O.NEAR ZINC RAILWAY GATE, MINDI POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. GUNDLA DURGA VENKATA PRASAD REDDY, S/O.LATE KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU [R2&3 BEING MINORS REP BY THEIR MOTHER & NEXT FRIENT R1] R/O.NEAR ZINC RAILWAY GATE, MINDI POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 342 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the operation of the order and decree dated 25.08.2008 in OP No.2007 passed by the Family Court, Visakhapatnam peending disposal of the appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 2 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SRINIVASA RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.167 of 2008 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) It was represented across the bench on 26.03.2025 that the learned counsel for the appellant was no more. Accordingly, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant. Pursuant thereto, notice was issued by the Registry, but the same was returned with the postal endorsement that “no such person in the door number”. Hence, it was returned to the sender. 2. This Court made an attempt to serve notice to the appellant at the address mentioned in the appeal. It is the responsibility of the appellant to engage some advocate after the demise of the original counsel. The matter was posted today under the caption ‘for dismissal’ and even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. All these circumstances indicate that the appellant has no intertest to prosecute the appeal. 3. In view of the same, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:10.09.2025 SCS 5 61 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.167 of 2008 Dt.10.09.2025 SCS