1 2025:CGHC:34106 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3705 of 2025 1 - Shahid Khan Pinjara S/o Mohd. Shabuddin Khan Pinjara, Aged About 41 Years R/o Mahamai Ward, Chudi Line Mungeli, District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Abdul Sattar Khan S/o Abdul Gaffar Khan, Aged About 59 Years R/o House No. 2, Gandhi Ward, Tahsil And District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Ishak Khokhar S/o Late Mod. Ibrahim Khokhar, Aged About 52 Years R/o Bhawan No. 12, Malviya Marg, Param Hans Ward, Near Gurudrawa, Tahsil And District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Mohd. Aziz S/o Mohd. Safik, Aged About 51 Years R/o House No. 52/1, New Bus Stand, Shiva Ji Marg Mungeli Tahsil And District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Saiyyad Usman Ali Manihar S/o Saiyyad Garib Ali, Aged About 61 Years R/o Yusuf Marg, Mahamai Marg, Ward No. 14, Tahsil And District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Abdul Halim Khan S/o Abdul Hakeem Khan, Aged About 55 Years R/o Shankar Ward, Malhapara, Mungeli, Tahsil And District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Minority Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Commissioner, Division Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Collector, Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R), Sub Division Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh Waqf Board, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Firdosh Ali, Election In-Charge Of Sunni Kachchhi Maszid Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli (Chhattisgarh) ----Respondents Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.07.21 11:02:21 +0530 2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. G.A. For Respondent : Mr. Rajkumar Sahu, on behalf of Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 18/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the present matter has become infructuous and he does not want to press the present petition as the election which is going to be held on 19.07.2025 has been stayed. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition, if any new cause of action arises. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti