Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-7426-2025 & -1- CWP-7446-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 149+150 Date of Decision: 18.03.2025 (I) CWP-7426-2025 Neeraj Mittal and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents (II) CWP-7446-2025 Neeraj Mittal and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate and Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners (in both cases). Ms. Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (ORAL) Vide this common order, two petitions bearing CWP-7426-2025 and CWP-7446-2025 (both titled as Neeraj Mittal and another vs State of Haryana and others), are being disposed of, as the similar question of law and facts are involved therein.
2. Prayer in the present petition(s) filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus DINESH BANSAL 2025.03.25 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-7426-2025 & -2- CWP-7446-2025 for directing respondent No.1-the Financial Commissioner, Haryana to decide the revision petitions bearing ROR No.89 of 2023 and ROR No.90 of 2023, both titled as Smt. Kaushalya Devi v. Satwant Singh (since deceased) and others, in a time bound manner.
3. Pursuant to the advance copy of petition having been supplied to learned State counsel, she submits that the afore-said revision petition(s) are pending consideration before the learned Financial Commissioner, Haryana for 19.03.2025. However, the petitioners herein had filed an application seeking impleadment therein and in all probability, the said application for impleadment would be considered and decided by the learned Financial Commissioner along with the main revision petition(s) on 19.03.2025 itself and in any case, not beyond a period of six weeks thereafter.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the afore-said course of action being adopted.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the respective parties, both the petitions i.e. CWP-7426-2025 and CWP-7446-2025 (titled as Neeraj Mittal and another vs State of Haryana and others), are disposed of, accordingly.
6. Copy of this order be placed on the file of other connected matter.
(HARSH BUNGER) 18.03.2025
JUDGE D.Bansal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2025.03.25 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh