APHC010559442016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7521/2016 Between: Satti Nagi Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Prl Secretary and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. KANDA SRINIVASU SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (KS AND WG) 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following Order: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice vide No.17/2016, dt.10-2-2016, issued by the executive officer of the 4th respondent qua the R.C.C. building bearing D.No.10-28-12, in R.S.No.51/2, Narasimharaopeta, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari 2 District, is illegal, arbitrary, usurping the powers of the Tribunal and violative of Art 300-A of the Constitution of India and the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 as amended from time to time and the Rules made there under and consequently set aside the notice vide No.17/2016, dt.10-2-2016 of the 4th respondent…….” 2. This Court, vide order, dated 09.03.2016, directed the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the R.C.C. building bearing D.No.10-28-12, in R.S.No.51/2, Narasimharaopeta, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari district. 3. Heard Mr.T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. 4. On hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that O.A.No.476 of 2012 is pending before the Andhra Pradesh Endowments Tribunal regarding the rights of the parties concerned. Therefore, this Court may dispose of the writ petition by making the interim order dated 09.03.2016 absolute. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader does not refute to the above submissions. 6. On considering the submissions of both the learned counsels and upon perusing the entire material on record, this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition, directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession 3 and enjoyment of the R.C.C. building bearing D.No.10-28-12, in R.S.No.51/2, Narasimharaopeta, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari district, till the disposal of O.A.No.476 of 2012. 7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J BMS