Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35307 (RAJ)

KEDAR S/O MOHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16145/2024 · 2025-01-16

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16145/2024 Kedar S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhanokhar, P.s. Bahatu-Kala, Distt. Alwar. (Presently Confined In District Jail At Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.240/2024 registered at Police Station Bahatu-Kala (Devi Dholagarh), District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, considering the long custody period of the accused-petitioner, the bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submitted that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and 8 other cases were registered against him under (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16145/2024] various Sections, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Kedar S/o Mohanlal in connection FIR No.240/2024 registered at Police Station Bahatu-Kalan (Devi Dholagarh), District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -269