Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2519-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 03, 2025 Sewa Haryana … Appellant Versus D.S. Devesh and Ors. …Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Varun Baath, Advocate for Mr. A.K. Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
DEEPAK GUPTA
, J.(Oral)
On the last date of hearing, counsel for the par"es made a request to issue fresh no"ce to both the par"es submi"ng that despite all possible efforts, par"es were not in their contact. Pursuant thereto, no"ce to both the par"es was issued, which has been received back with the report that no such person is residing at the given address of the appellant and against respondent Nos.1 to 3 report of incomplete address has been received. Despite making all possible efforts, the whereabouts of the par"es are not known and the counsel appearing on their behalf are unable to contact them. It appears that both the par"es are no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu"on with liberty to get it revived, in case any cause of ac"on s"ll survives. July 03, 2025
(DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2025.07.03 18:45 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order