Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29721 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12906 of 2022 Petitioner :- Ram Ashrey Yadav Respondent :- U.P. State Electricity Board And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.S. Pandey,Ramsagar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Lal Mani Singh Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. In the instant case, the petitioner has made a claim for regularization of his services on the post of IV class employee. Shri Lal Mani Singh, learned counsel for the respondents calls attention to relevant pleadings in the counter affidavit and on that basis submits as under: A). As per the records of the respondents, the petitioner has not been functioning as daily wager since the year 1991. B). The letter dated 20.04.1998 was issued by the respondent No.3 who had no legal legal authority to do so. No reliance can be placed on the same. Shri R.S.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner baldly disputes the averments in the counter affidavit. The denial on part of the petitioner of this specific averments does not hold water and is liable to be rejected. Further, even if the said submissions on part of the petitioner are taken on face value, it only raises the disputed questions of fact. The writ petition cannot be invoked to adjudicate the aforesaid disputed question of fact which entails introduction and appraisal of evidence. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad