IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No. 500 of 2019 Decided on: 11.11.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Kishore Kumar Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Divya Jyoti vice Mr. Vasu Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents- No. 1 and 2. Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 3. Respondent No. 4 already ex-parte. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Learned vice Counsel Ms. Divya Jyoti on instructions of Mr. Vasu Sood, Advocate, as received from the petitioner states that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the instant proceedings which may 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - be given a closure. [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel as well as Learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.3. . In the above scenario and taking into account the statement made by Learned vice Counsel for the petitioner on instruction of Original Counsel, the instant petition is closed and is disposed of accordingly. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 11, 2025 (tm)