APHC010558622018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26458/2018 Between: 1. S.JAYARAMI REDDY, S/O S.RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, WORKING AS SECRETARY THE KALLUR PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, KURNOOL. 4. THE KALLUR PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, KALLUR, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN/ PERSON IN CHARGE KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in trying to retire the petitioner at the age of 58 years as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and opposed to their own resolution dated 03-06-2015 and consequently issue a direction to 2 the respondent No.4 to continue the petitioner beyond 58 years till he attains the age of 60 years in accordance with their own resolution along with all consequential benefits.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.M.Shalini, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, this Court has passed interim order dated 31.07.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 directing the Respondents to continue the services of the Petitioners till the age of 60 years. 3. Sri A.Krishna Kishore, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation would submit that they have complied with the interim order passed by this Court and hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of and the interim order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018, dated 31.07.2018, is made absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:27.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26458 of 2018 Dt.27.03.2025 Dinesh