2025:CGHC:42302 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8172 of 2025 Shailesh Kumar Dubey S/o Shambhu Prasad Dubey Aged About 50 Years Occupation Service, Presently Transferred As Teacher (L.B.), Government Middle School, Sonaidih, Block Bamnidih, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Block Bamnidih, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri S Choubey, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 21.08.2025 1. Petitioner has challenged orders dated 05.07.2025 (Annexure P1) and order dated 07.06.2025 (Annexure P2), by which the petitioner has been transferred from the Government Middle School Sonaidih, Block-Bamnidih, District-Janjgir-champa to the Government Middle School, Koylarie, Block- Lormi, District Mungeli under the Rationalization Instructions. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.08.26 11:56:53 +0530 Wps 8172 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has not joined at the transferred place of posting, and the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances, and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law, as early as possible, in objective manner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma