KHEMCHAND MAHLA S/O LATE SHRI NARAYAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/626/2025 · 2025-02-03
Sudesh Bansal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4543] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 626/2025 Khemchand Mahla S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Village Mahla Ki Dhani, Tehsil Sikar Rural, District Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Special Secretary, Revenue (Group-I), Department, Jaipur.
3. Board Of Revenue, Through Its Deputy Registrar (Land Record) Rajasthan, Ajmer.
4. The District Collector (Revenue), Sikar.
5. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Dhod, District Sikar.
6. The Tehsildar, Sikar Rural, Sikar.
7. Gram Panchayat Bidoli, Panchayat Samiti Dhod, District, Sikar Through Its Village Development Officer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.P. Singh Rajawat, Ms. Shikha Sharma for Mr. G. S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 03/02/2025
1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has raised a grievance in respect of amalgamation of revenue village Mahla Ki Dhani, Tehsil Sikar Rural, District Sikar into original revenue village Aantri,
[2025:RJ-JP:4543] (2 of 2) [CW-626/2025] Tehsil Sikar Rural, District Sikar, pursuant to the directions issued by the Board of Revenue on 08.08.2024 (Ann.6).
2. Counsel for the petitioner during the course of arguments admits that the petitioner is not raising any personal grievance, but he is raising a grievance in the interest of public at large and particularly in the interest of villagers of village Mahla Ki Dhani, Tehsil Sikar Rural, District Sikar, hence, in that view, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation.
3. Counsel for the respondents has no objection in allowing to withdraw the writ petition.
4. In view of above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for.
5. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/9