Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
127
DINESH KUMAR
STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr
for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
MANISHA BATRA
1. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short directions the official respondents investigation in a complainant filed against the private respondent action on his representation da
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prayer and has on 07.01.2025 P-3) raising his has not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to representation filed by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M Date of decision:
DINESH KUMAR
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma and Mr. Kartik Gandhi for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
**** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) the official respondents No.2 to 6 investigation in a complainant filed against the private respondent his representation dated 07.01.2025 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner ha before the S.H.O, Police Station Dera Bassi, Mohali ( his grievances as mentioned in the present has not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would e issued to respondents No. 2 representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.15165 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025
…. Petitioner Versus
…. Respondents MANISHA BATRA
Shiv Kumar Sharma and Mr. Kartik Gandhi, Advocates Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under 528 of Bharatiya ‘BNSS’) seeking issuance of a writ No.2 to 6 to conduct fair and impartial investigation in a complainant filed against the private respondent and to take Annexure P-3). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his submitted that the petitioner has recently filed a representation Police Station Dera Bassi, Mohali (Annexure in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate and 3 to decide the aforesaid necessary action thereon.
Bharatiya seeking issuance of a writ conduct fair and impartial take restricted his recently filed a representation Annexure petition but the same further satisfied if appropriate decide the aforesaid Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab Court, has accepted the notice that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h
5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent aforesaid representation within a period of law. 20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV
CRM-M No.15165 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent epresentation dated 07.01.2025 (Annexure P period of one month, by passing a speaking order in
(MANISHA BATRA)
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No
No.15165 of 2025 -2- Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to decide the Annexure P-3)of the petitioners assing a speaking order in accordance with (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without
disposed the s accordance with Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document