Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35288 (KAR)

J JANARDHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/595/2023 · 2025-02-21

Krishna S Dixit

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7901 RP No. 595 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT REVIEW PETITION NO. 595 OF 2023 BETWEEN: J JANARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O LATE K M JAYARAMA REDDY, RESIDENT OF KODIHALLI VILLAGE, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES, GROUND FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPURTY COMMISSIONER FOR FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, CHICKBALLAPUR - 562 101. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, CHICKBALLAPUR - 562 101. 4. J VINITH S/O LATE K M JAYARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O KODIHALLI VILLAGE, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.ANANTHANARAYANA K S.,ADVOCATE FOR R4) Digitally signed by CHETAN B C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7901 RP No. 595 of 2023 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 22/08/2022 PASSED IN WP NO. 50091/2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE –A IN THER INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT ORAL ORDER Both the sides agree that there is some amicable settlement with the mediation made by their mother. Counsel for respondent no.4 who is the contesting party herein has filed a memo dated 21.02.2025 which is signed by the counsel for the petitioner also. The memo reads as under: “The respondent No.4 humbly submits that he has no objection to review the order passed in his favour in W.P.No.50091/2019 dated 22/08/2022, and to direct the respondent No.3 to issue/transfer the authorization in favour of his brother who is the petitioner in this review petition instead of Respondent No.4 in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. In view of the above memo, the judgment dated 22.08.2022 passed in W.P.No.50091/2019 is recalled and that the 3rd respondent-authority shall act upon the memo - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7901 RP No. 595 of 2023 in accordance with law by issuing transfer of authorization in favour of review petitioner Mr.J.Janardhan within eight weeks. Review petition is accordingly disposed off. In view of settlement, no orders be passed on the pending applications I.A.No.1/2023 & I.A.2/2023. They pale into insignificance. Costs made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Snb/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3