Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 16954/2025 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 10.11.2025
1. CWP No. 16954/2025
Sameer
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
2. CWP No. 17032/2025
Harish Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
3. CWP No. 17042/2025
Mamta Devi
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
4. CWP No. 17044/2025
Ghanshyam
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
5. CWP No. 17150/2025
Jitender Kumar
…Petitioner
2
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Ms. Shivani Priya, Advocate, vice
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, in
all the petitions.
For the respondents: Mr.
L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General, in all the
petitions.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in all the petitions.
2.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Hem Raj Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 and Dr. Lekh Raj Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.3 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2CWP No. 2171 of 2023, decided a/w connected matter on 04.09.2023 3 LPA No. 102/2010 decided 13.01.2012
3 law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
3.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgments, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 10th November, 2025(rohit)