IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20486 of 2025 Decided on: 24th December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kulbhushan & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be content if the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authorities to decide their respective representations dated 17.11.2025 [Annexure P-1(colly)] in a time bound manner in view of the law laid down by this Court in CWP No. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 1638/2024, titled as Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. decided on 29.11.2024. 3. Prayer, being innocuous, is considered and allowed. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order strictly in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Sushil Kukreja) December 24, 2025 Judge Rohit