- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:41 CRL.P No. 12539 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12539 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR. SATISH @ CHETHAN @ LADDU, S/O MR. ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO. 30/3, MAYURANAGAR, 9TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, ANDHRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, HEGGANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 091. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TIGADI VEERANNA GADIGEPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MADANAYAKANAHALLI P.S., REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. ASMA KOUSER, ADDL.SPP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN CR.NO.265/2020 REGISTERED BY THE MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:41 CRL.P No. 12539 of 2024 P/U/S 143,302,147,148,341,323,394,201,120B,149,109, OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE HONBEL VIII ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU IN S.C.NO.37/2021. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER This is a successive bail petition filed by the petitioner / accused No.1 to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.265/2020 registered at Madanayakanahally Police Station, Bengaluru. 2. This Court after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, has dismissed Crl.P.No.13357/2023 filed by the petitioner on 18.01.2024. Prior to the said dismissal, the prayer for bail was rejected on four occasions. 3. Charge sheet is filed against accused Nos.1 to 9 for offences punishable under Sections 143, 302, 147, 148, 341, 323, 394, 201, 120B, 109 read with 149 of IPC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:41 CRL.P No. 12539 of 2024 4. The Trial is pending in S.C.No.37/2021 connected with S.C.No.93/2021 on the file of VIII Additional District and Sessions Court, Bengaluru Rural district, Bengaluru. 5. In the above facts and circumstances, at this stage it is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail, as no changed circumstances are made out to once again consider the prayer for bail. However, petitioner is at liberty to move this Court if the trail is not completed within the next four months. 6. Petition is dismissed with above observation. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49