MADAN LAL AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS
CRM(M)/552/2023 · 2025-03-25
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3528 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3528 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM (M) No. 552/2023
Madan Lal and Anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None q
vs
UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. P. D. Singh, Dy. AG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 25.03.2025
The record reveals that for the last three consecutive dates, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and same is the position today as well. It appears that petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu 25.03.2025 Sushant
16