Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17267] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16257/2024 Ramveer S/o Gyan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Dhamari, Police Station Khoh, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Singh Rawat For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Hemendra Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 24/04/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.4/2023 registered at Police Station- Khoh, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 336, 307, 379, 427 and 504 IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that on the previous occurrence also, an FIR was lodged by the petitioner and due to that enmity, this false FIR has been lodged against the petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 24.11.2024. Co- accused has been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court. Charge-sheet has been filed. Therefore, no fruitful purpose
[2025:RJ-JP:17267] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16257/2024] will be served for keeping the petitioner behind the bars hence he be released on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application stating that as per the FIR, it is specifically mentioned that Ramveer had inflicted gun shot injury to the injured who is 11 years old and the attempt has been made by the petitioner at his instance. As per the medical report, the nature of injuries are sufficiently dangerous to life, therefore, the bail application be rejected.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Hence, the present bail application is hereby dismissed.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/23