DHARAMVEER @ KARAMVEER SINGH @ KARANIYA @ SURAJBHAN S/O RAMESHWAR DAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16178/2024 · 2025-01-28
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35277 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35277 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3983] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16178/2024 Dharamveer @ Karamveer Singh @ Karaniya @ Surajbhan S/o Rameshwar Das, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Mirpur P.s .sadar Sirsa, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Matolia Mr. Chandrashekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.218/2022 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Learned counsel argue that only evidence against the petitioner is that he received Rs.1,00,000/- in his bank account from the main accused of this case. It is argued that petitioner is in custody since
18.08.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in
[2025:RJ-JP:3983] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16178/2024] its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner is the member of gang. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the role attributed to the petitioner and the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Dharamveer @ Karamveer Singh @ Karaniya @ Surajbhan S/o Rameshwar Das, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /161