Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35276 (HP)

SULOCHNA KUMARI v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CMP/24208/2025 · 2025-12-08

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SULOCHNA KUMARI Versus STATE OF HP AND ORS CMP-24208 of 2025 in EX.P.-759 of 2025 08.12.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Singh Jagota, proxy counsel, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State. While placing on record communication dated 04.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 30.09.2025 passed by Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Kullu, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that petitioner has been granted benefit in terms of Mohit Sharma’s judgment, as prayed for. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General, as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. However, respondents are directed to ensure that consequential benefits flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within three months from today. December 08, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge