Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35274 (CHH)

DILIP PATEL v. VIJENDRA SHUKLA

CRMP/2209/2023 · 2025-08-06

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:39482 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2209 of 2023 Dilip Patel S/o Rambhai Patel, Aged About Years, Proprietor-Jyoti Hardware And Plywood, In Front Of Narayani Hospital, Mungeli Road, Bilaspur, Police Station - Civil Line, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus Vijendra Shukla S/o , Aged About - Years, R/o M.I.G. 79, Deendayal Colony, Mangla, Bilaspur, Police Station - Civil Line, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Vishwanath Prasad Shriwas, Advocate. For Respondent : None. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 07.08.2025 1) During the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to question the legality and propriety of the impugned judgment dated 20.04.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) in Complaint Case No.110/2021, before the learned Sessions Court under Section 372 of Cr.P.C., in view of principles laid down by SUNITA GOSWAMI Digitally signed by SUNITA GOSWAMI Date: 2025.08.07 18:06:46 +0530 2 Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., reported in 2025 INSC 804. 2) Having considered the aforesaid submissions of the counsel appearing for the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid principles laid down by the Supreme Court, the instant petition stands disposed of with a direction that, if the petitioner questions the impugned judgment of acquittal in appeal within a period of 30 days from today, the concerned Sessions Judge would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the appeal, in accordance with law. 3) Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned judgment and relevant documents to counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same and, shall remit the record to the concerned Court forthwith. 4) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE sunita