[2025:RJ-JP:6132] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 16322/2024 Vijay Singh S/o Shri Bajrang Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Gangwa, Police Station Parbatsar District Nagaur Second Address Resident Of 86, Green Park E, Nagal Jaisa Bora, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendu Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Prashant Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, G.A-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 12/02/2025 1. The present 4th bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.1186/2022 Registered at Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120B IPC (later on offence(s) under Sections 148, 302/149, 109, 120B IPC and Section 3/25(6) of Arms Act were found to have been made out). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 13.11.2022. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is no evidence against the petitioner that he had committed murder of Vijendra Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner also [2025:RJ-JP:6132] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16322/2024] submits that petitioner was implicated in this case on account of CCTV footage. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that during trial, PW2-Babu Lal in his cross-examination stated that he could not say as to who was sitting on which vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that nothing was recovered from the petitioner. Conclusion of trial may take long time. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned GA-cum-AAG has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner and co-accused Baljit Singh had hatched a conspiracy and played an active role in committing the murder of deceased- Vijendra Singh. So, the 4th bail application filed by the petitioner be dismissed. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned GA-cum-AAG. 5. During the investigation, Investigating Officer had collected evidence from which it is revealed that the petitioner and co- accused Baljit Singh had played an active role in committing the murder of deceased-Vijendra Singh. As per the CCTV footage, the petitioner was present near the house of the deceased while he was recceing before the incident. So, looking to the gravity of offence and nature of allegation(s), I do not consider it a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Consequently, this 4th bail application is dismissed. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /33