Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35273 (AP)

M/S SAI SUBRAHMANYESWARA ICE FACTORY v. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED & 4 OTHERS

CMA/12/2013 · 2025-07-17

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010558522013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 12/2013 Between: 1. M/S SAI SUBRAHMANYESWARA ICE FACTORY, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI BETHU RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, R/O. D.NO. 19-65, MAKALAVARI VEEDHI ATTILI VILLAGE, ATTILI MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED 4 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEAR GURUDWAR, VISAKHAPATAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION TOWN, EASTERN POWR DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, GANAPAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATION AOUTH EASTERN, POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, ATTILI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER D P E2 ELURU, EASATERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 2550 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 123 days in re-submitting the Case SR No. 23408 of 2012 in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI 2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.12 of 2013 ORDER: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no further orders are required and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording, the above submission, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.07.2025 M K K