NASEEMA BEGUM v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
WP(C)/1404/2021 · 2025-05-14
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3527 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3527 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 1404/2021 c/w WP (C) No. 2401/2021 CCP (S) No. 134/2022
Naseema Begum .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s UT of J&K .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Ms. Monika Thakur, Assisting counsel to Mr. S S Nanda, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 14.05.2025
WP (C) Nos. 1404 & 2401 of 2021 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today, so was the case on the last three consecutive dates of hearing, which suggests that either with the efflux of time, the instant petitions have been rendered infructuous or the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petitions any further. In the aforesaid backdrop, the instant writ petitions are accordingly, dismissed along with connected application(s), if any. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
CCP (S) No. 134/2022 In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition. As such, the proceedings in the same are accordingly dropped.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 14.05.2025 Manan Sr. No. 39