Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35255 (RAJ)

DHUM SINGH S/O BHAWANI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16239/2024 · 2025-01-16

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2299] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16239/2024 Dhum Singh S/o Bhawani Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Bhesani Police Station Mishroli District Jhalawar (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anmol Dhakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.110/2024 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged quantity contraband articles i.e. poppy straw recovered from the possession of the accused- petitioner is 13 Kg 250 grams, which is below commercial quantity. There is no criminal antecedents of similar nature of cases against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long, trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, [2025:RJ-JP:2299] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16239/2024] therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the alleged quantity of poppy straw recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner is below commercial quantity. There is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner regarding commission of offence under NDPS Act. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long, trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dhum Singh S/o Bhawani Singh in connection with FIR No.110/2024 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/279